s08 Technological Performance

From gt0338d - 2008-03-23

Good narrative at the top. Consider putting descriptions with the links, though. No link provided back to systems page. All other tech performance comments addressed to some degree.

From gt0338d - 2008-03-08

Your top Technological Performance page could benefit from some annotations. Performance parameters page was best of breed. A bit of an introduction at the top of the page would have been nice, but the content is exemplary! Buyer’s guide covers the big stuff. One image is broken on this page. The FMEA page could benefit from an introduction. The table appears to be messed up in this case. It was supposed to be organized by component, which in your case includes the masonry unit itself and the mortar holding them together. You did mention mortar issues, but it didn’t appear as a component in and of itself. Nice job of using the functional performance parameters to organize the table. Please go back and fix the format.  There’s also a large space beneath the table – I almost didn’t see the stuff at the bottom of the page. For your third party eval, you are actually mostly considering organizations rather than documents, although this is a valid interpretation of the assignment. You do a good job with the CARS analysis. This section would have been more immediately useful if it referenced specific documents, though. Trade associations section was best of breed – very nice job including a local organization!

From a formatting standpoint:

o    The pages have not been formatted properly.
o    One image on the Buyer’s Guide page is not opening.
o    The link connecting back from the FMEA page to the technological page is missing.
o    There are spelling mistakes at many places.