BC 2014: Construction Principles I

Insulated Concrete Form - Foam

Insulated Concrete Form - Foam
System Scoping Technological Performance Human Performance Ecological Performance Economic Performance

 Insulated Concrete Forms - Foam

Ecological Performance


 

Materials Flow Analysis

Material Complete.bmp

All Diagrams taken from 1998 ERG

 

The basic materials used in making a wall with insulated concrete forms are concrete, re-bar and expanded polystyrene forms. By looking these basic materials up in the ERG you can find diagrams of the materials breakdowns which were assembled above.

 

Supply Chain Risk Analysis

For the supply chain risk analysis several assumptions have been made in order to construct the risk assessment.

Crude oil as a major component of just about every product used to construct ICF's is in question as far as supply goes. Currently oil prices are very unstable, and most likely will increase as the world's consumption increases. This has a significant effect on every other component of the system even though it may not be a raw material because the products need to be delivered to manufacturers and jobsites by truck, train, etc. I have assumed that as time goes on dwindling supplies held by middle-eastern countries will increase in price and thus have a significant effect on economic viability of ICF's. Also, burning of oil is a major contributor to greenhouse gases. This burning of fossil fuels, as well as drilling has an effect on the environment. As time goes on, the world will be more concerned with the environmental impact of crude oil as an energy/raw material source. This leads to crude oil having the greatest impact on the risk analysis.

Limestone in itself has little impact on the risk assessment. I believe that long term consumption of limestone as a raw material has little effect on the risk analysis. Although there may be increased regulation on mining as time goes on, I believe that this will have little effect on the price or availability of limestone as raw material. I am assigning the overall risk assessment to be low

Portland Cement is widely available and will have little risk even through the 25 year assessment although there may be increased regulation on production practices. I am assigning the overall risk to be low

Steel is also widely available and has little risk involved in the long term. It is possible though that there will be increased regulation on CO2 emission, but taking into account all risks, the overall risk is low.

Petrochemical products also make up a significant portion of ICF's. Their primary use is in the Styrofoam insulation. Styrofoam is widely available, and easily made, but at the same time it is subject to the cost of crude oil and natural gas from which it is made. In addition, it is very difficult to break down Styrofoam in the natural environment. Its primary risk is in that of end of life use and whether or not to put it in a landfill or to recycle it. Increasing attention to recycling and more efficient techniques are leading to wider recycling of Styrofoam products and because of this I am assigning a moderate risk rating because of the questions as to disposal and production of the product.

Natural gas is in the same situation as crude oil. Although reserves of natural gas are plentiful, the recent emphasis on reducing greenhouse emissions has lead to questions about natural gas. In the short term natural gas will prove to be a reliable source of fuel, but as we enter into the 10 and 25 year risk analysis, more risk is involved with natural gas as a raw material in ICF's.  I have assigned little risk for the 5 year term, and moderate to high for the 25 year term. This is a combination of many different problems but overall natural gas has a lower risk than crude oil but still suffers from its fossil fuel label.

Green=Low Risk

Orange=Moderate Risk

Red=High Risk

Five year risk assesement

five year.jpg

Ten Year Risk analysis

10 year risks.jpg

25 year risk analysis

25 year risks.jpg

Materials, Energy, and Waste Inventory For Installation Stage and Usage

Resources.bmp

 

The resources needed for assembling and installing insulated concrete forms are simple. The only real piece of machinery that is used is a pump truck to pump the concrete into the forms. The rest can be done by laborers with simply a ladder.

 

Collateral Damage Analysis for Installation and Use Phases

Foam Insulated Concrete Forms have very few negative effects, although the polystyrene foam can have some negative effects on the environment and on humans. The polystyrene foam can let off volatile organic compounds which are hazardous to a person?s health.  If for some reason the polystyrene foam is ingested then serious illness or death may occur to humans and/or animals. Polystyrene foam can be harmful to the ecosystem because it can take over 500 years to decompose. Therefore if some of the scrap polystyrene from the insulated concrete forms is not disposed of properly, it could damage the ecosystem.

http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-08292005-164527/unrestricted/ETD_Huali_Yuan.pdf

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polystyrene#Disposal_and_recycling

 

Collateral Synergy Analysis for Installation and Use Phases

Foam Insulated Concrete Forms is a great example of synergy. Foam ICFs reduce construction time, increase efficiency, reduce material use, and they are very low maintenance. The ICFs are forms for concrete and also serve as insulation for the structure. ICFs are great insulators which saves energy during the use of the structure. Construction time is reduced because forms don?t actually have to be built. Although the polystyrene can let off VOCs, it is actually very safe. There really are not any health impacts caused to the occupants of the building. The polystyrene foam is completely recyclable so as long as it is disposed of properly it should not hurt the ecosystem.  Overall, foam ICFs have many positive effects during installation and use.

https://learn.vt.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_id=_2_1&url=%2fwebapps%2fblackboard%2fexecute%2flauncher%3ftype%3dCourse%26id%3d_57035_1%26url%3d

 

 

 End Of Life Analysis                                  

 

  Polystyrene Concrete
Health Risks Envirnmental Risk Potential Liabilities Health Risk Envirnmental Risk Potential Liabilities
Dump Out Back If ingested, Polystyrene is very harmful and may be fatal. Takes hundreds of years to break down and is very harmful if ingested. For this reason it is an extremely high risk to animals. Could be caught for illegal dumping/litering as well as held liable for illnesses or deaths caused by this illegal disposal.  The lime in cement could be released and contaminate water.  Could clog up creeks drain pipes, and even small rivers. This would cause a slower outflow of water and may lead to a flood.  Illegal dumping could cause floods by clogging creeks, rivers, and drainpipes. Contaminating water could also occur from the lime in cement.
Minimum Legal Scenario (Landfill/Incineration) In a landfill, properly burried, there is little to no risk of air pollution or groundwater pollution. If properly burned there are a few harmful gases realesed, but if improperly burned toxic gases could be fatal. Polystyrene takes about 500 years to break down. Despite this, there is little risk of contaminating the air or groundwater. IF Polystyrene is properly incinerated, the only chemicals released are water, Carbon dioxide, and some volatile compounds. If improperly burned, polycyclic aromatic compounds, carbon black, and carbon monoxide as well as styrene monomers can be created. Liability would fall on the owner of the landfill or the owner of the incinerator. It would be their job to properly dispose of the material once contractors have delivered it to them. Consumption of any contaminated water or wildlife could cause illness and/or death. If not properly disposed in the landfill, lime could leak through and contaminate creeks or nearby streams as well as the ground water. Owner of the landfill would be responsible for making sure the concrete is properly disposed.
Proactive Environmental Senario (Recycling) Polystyrene is mainly turned into other products so there is little to no health risk when recycled. When recycled, Polystyrene is generally resused as fillers in other plastics that cannot themselves be recycled. Manufacturers need to be responsible and use  polystyrene only in products that are safe to contain this material. There is little to no health risk in recycling concrete. One minor risk may include respiratory problems from inhaling the dust. Some energy is used to break down the already cured concrete. This is significantly lower than producing cement from scratch. Recycled concrete is not as strong so the reuse of this concrete needs to be properly monitored.  

 

      If I was a contractor and had to remove this wall system I would send the polystyrene to a landfill and recycle the concrete. Recycling polystyrene is very expensive, due to the fact that there are few recycling plants. Also, the health and environmental risk are extremely low if properly burried in a landfill. I would not choose to have it incinerated because there is a greater chance of human error and create more harm than good. I would recycle the concrete because it is very easy and cost about the same to send to a landfill.

 

http://www.cawrecycles.org/issues/eps_health

http://blogonsmog.com/environmental-friendly/2008/7/22/the-problem-with-styrofoam.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polystyrene#Disposal_and_recycling

 http://www.dnr.state.wi.us/org/aw/wm/publications/demolition/wa605.pdf

 

 ECO-Block
 Human Health Claims
  • "The ECO-Block® building system does not contain CFCs, HCFCs, formaldehyde, asbestos or fiberglass. The EPS used in the ECO-Block® forms is completely stable and inert, and it will NOT break down over time."
  • "ECO-Block® foam is hypoallergenic, which can be very important for those with sensitive skin.2 It does NOT produce any fumes or gasses once installed."
  • "Building with ECO-Block® greatly reduces the air infiltration into a structure, thereby allowing for greater control of the quality of the interior air. There are no drafts or cold spots."
Source: Eco-Block Residential
 Environmental Impacts
  • "ECO-Block® buildings consistently save 25- 50% in monthly utility costs 1ver the life span of the structure, translating into fewer resources consumed for the creation of energy. Beyond the insulating qualities of the foam block (R-22), the thermal mass of the concrete acts as an energy reservoir, which helps maintain an even indoor temperature. Consequently, the HVAC system can be scaled down by up to 35%, offering another added cost savings."
  • "There is no use of CFC or HCFC blowing agents that would escape into the atmosphere. This means ZERO Ozone Depletion Potential (O.D.P.). Since Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) is expanded to approximately 50 times its original volume, it is a very efficient and economical use of basic raw material. ECO-Block® uses recycled material whenever possible. All of the embedded webbing and a percentage of the connectors are manufactured from 100% post-industrial recycled copolymer polypropylene. Concrete itself is inert, non-toxic, and produced from natural and recycled materials."
  • "The ECO-Block® construction method involves minimal waste and all residual pieces can be recycled or reused in future projects. A structure built with ECO-Block® and concrete is more likely to withstand the ravages of fire, high winds, driving rains and earthquake. There is no wood rot or rodent damage and termites can't eat concrete; hence there is little maintenance or need to rebuild, improving the cost efficiency of the product over the lifetime of the building."
Source: Eco-Block Residential
 Resource Consumption
  • "An average 2,000ft² home built with ECO-Block® can save up to 47 trees, which would have been cut for creating lumber."
  • "Manufacturing waste is kept to less than 3%, which is generated in the set-up of the forms. Waste EPS material can be reground and reused in other EPS foam products"
  • "ECO-Block® is 50% more efficient to ship and handle than other Insulated Concrete Forms (ICF) since it is sold in flat panels that pack tightly, thereby shipping virtually no air space. A UV protective plastic wrap is used to contain a bundle of panels during shipping and storage."
  • "ECO-Block® is manufactured in several strategic locations throughout North America, generally within about 500 miles of any job site. Concrete is always sourced locally. This both supports the local economy and saves on transportation costs."
Source: Eco-Block Residential
Logix ICF
Human Health Claims
  • "LOGIX homes are airtight structures. This makes airflow and ventilation easier to control and monitor. The
    end result is a healthier, comfortable environment for occupants, and a reduction in HVAC capacity."

Source: Logix, Logix Brochure

Environmental Impacts
  • "The high R-value, along with high thermal mass and reduced air infiltration, allow LOGIX walls to deliver significantly higher performance levels."
  • "Although the up-front construction cost of a LOGIX home may be slightly higher than a traditional wood-framed home, the actual ?overall living? cost is often lower when energy savings are considered."
Source: Logix
Resource Consumption
  • "LOGIX ICF walls conserve precious natural forest resources and their energy efficiency reduces fuel consumption."
  • "The combination of the LOGIX continuous foam insulation and the thermal mass properties of insulated concrete provide a high thermal resistance wall system that reduces the peak heating and cooling loads on the building. This thermal envelope produces an airtight structure and reduces air leakage and energy use."
Source: Logix, Logix Brochure
 
Reward Wall Systems
Human Health Claims
  •  "Our ICFs improve thermal comfort by reducing air infiltration from the outside."
Source: Reward Wall System
Environmental Impacts
  •  "Our ICFs help minimize energy use and optimize performance. Heating and cooling costs are reduced as much as 50% to 80%."
  • "There are no CFCs, HCFCs or formaldehyde used in the manufacturing process"
Source: Reward Wall System
Resource Consumption
  •  "Because our ICFs are so light and because of our multiple plants, Reward forms require fewer fossil fuels to ship."
  • "100% of the installation waste is recyclable"
  • "and of course fewer wood products are used in our buildings."
Source: Reward Wall System
Greenbuilding.com
Human Health Claims
  • RISK "To protect against potential damage from wood-boring insects, some EPS foam used in ICFs contains borates, which are benign to humans and the environment; however, the brominated flame retardants used in most EPS foam have health and environmental risks that are generating significant concern."
Source: Green Building
Credibility and Reasonableness

     The claims made by these manufacturers must be taken with a grain of salt.  These claims may be true but there information may be presented to influence the potential customer. For example, the way a company measures an r-value may not be the same as another company, so comparing the r-values may be difficult. As suggested by greenbuilding.com try to look for the "steady state" r value when making comparisons.

     Another thing to consider is that the manufacturer's did not mention any risks involved with their system.  I found one risk associated with IFC's from greenbuilding.com which was giving information about the system and not trying to sell anything.

Examples of normal and extreme claims
 Examples of normal and extreme claims are not provided because the manufacturers all tended to have the same general information.

 


Comments

Site

Changes
Index
Search

User

Log In

 
 

Last Modified 2008-10-31